Triple

T8640736
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Frigyes Riesz E204639 entity
Predicate name P16 FINISHED
Object Frigyes Riesz E204639 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Frigyes Riesz | Statement: [Frigyes Riesz, name, Frigyes Riesz]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Frigyes Riesz
Context triple: [Frigyes Riesz, name, Frigyes Riesz]
  • A. Frigyes Riesz chosen
    Frigyes Riesz was a Hungarian mathematician renowned for his foundational contributions to functional analysis and measure theory.
  • B. Lipót Fejér
    Lipót Fejér was a Hungarian mathematician renowned for his fundamental contributions to harmonic analysis and Fourier series, and for mentoring a generation of influential mathematicians.
  • C. Salomon Bochner
    Salomon Bochner was a prominent 20th-century mathematician known for his influential work in analysis, probability theory, and differential geometry.
  • D. Antoni Zygmund
    Antoni Zygmund was a Polish-American mathematician renowned for his foundational contributions to harmonic analysis and the theory of trigonometric series.
  • E. Ivar Fredholm
    Ivar Fredholm was a Swedish mathematician best known for his foundational work on integral equations, which played a key role in the development of functional analysis.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca834ca1c88190a11ffb0200342fac completed March 30, 2026, 2:06 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cc47944d1c819081f448f14d04bf9d completed March 31, 2026, 10:15 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69cebc340528819085c80b69d6d32a34 completed April 2, 2026, 6:57 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:28 p.m.