Triple

T8630267
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Hicks–Kaldor compensation criterion E204382 entity
Predicate relatedTo P37 FINISHED
Object Pareto efficiency E145374 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Pareto efficiency | Statement: [Hicks–Kaldor compensation criterion, relatedTo, Pareto efficiency]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Pareto efficiency
Context triple: [Hicks–Kaldor compensation criterion, relatedTo, Pareto efficiency]
  • A. Pareto efficiency chosen
    Pareto efficiency is an economic concept describing an allocation of resources where no individual can be made better off without making someone else worse off.
  • B. Pareto improvement
    A Pareto improvement is a change in allocation that makes at least one individual better off without making anyone else worse off.
  • C. Hicks–Kaldor compensation criterion
    The Hicks–Kaldor compensation criterion is an economic efficiency test stating that a policy change is desirable if those who gain could in principle compensate those who lose and still be better off, regardless of whether compensation actually occurs.
  • D. second fundamental theorem of welfare economics
    The second fundamental theorem of welfare economics states that, under certain ideal conditions, any Pareto efficient allocation of resources can be achieved as a competitive market equilibrium given an appropriate redistribution of initial endowments.
  • E. Bergson–Samuelson social welfare function
    The Bergson–Samuelson social welfare function is a formal tool in welfare economics that aggregates individual utilities into a single measure of social welfare to evaluate and compare economic states or policies.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca834b903c8190add96cc651e1a477 completed March 30, 2026, 2:06 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cc47406efc8190b559c68764b7455d completed March 31, 2026, 10:14 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69cebc0acf508190a090fb1edf9420d2 completed April 2, 2026, 6:57 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:27 p.m.