Triple

T86136
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Dust Bowl E1731 entity
Predicate hasResponse P767 FINISHED
Object creation of the Soil Conservation Service LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: creation of the Soil Conservation Service | Statement: [Dust Bowl, hasResponse, creation of the Soil Conservation Service]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasResponse
Context triple: [Dust Bowl, hasResponse, creation of the Soil Conservation Service]
  • A. wasResponseTo chosen
    Indicates that one event, action, or communication occurred as a direct reply or reaction to a preceding event, action, or communication.
  • B. hasCurrent
    Indicates that an entity presently possesses, exhibits, or is associated with a particular state, attribute, or resource at the current time.
  • C. hasForm
    Indicates that one entity possesses, exhibits, or is characterized by a particular shape, structure, or configuration.
  • D. hasClient
    Indicates that an entity maintains a client relationship with another entity, typically as a provider of goods or services.
  • E. hasProcess
    Indicates that an entity is associated with, participates in, or is characterized by a particular process.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a24c8150408190910a693eb51c1f71 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:01 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a250e401288190ba12322c9c5f07c9 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:20 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a24eb59e808190811c20518f39b1cc completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:11 a.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:06 a.m.