Triple
T86124
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Dust Bowl |
E1731
|
entity |
| Predicate | occursIn |
P40
|
FINISHED |
| Object | New Mexico |
E34095
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: New Mexico | Statement: [Dust Bowl, occursIn, New Mexico]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: New Mexico Context triple: [Dust Bowl, occursIn, New Mexico]
-
A.
New Mexico
chosen
New Mexico is a southwestern U.S. state known for its diverse landscapes, rich Native American and Hispanic cultural heritage, and historic cities like Santa Fe and Albuquerque.
-
B.
Arizona
Arizona is a southwestern U.S. state known for its desert climate, the Grand Canyon, and major cities like Phoenix and Tucson.
-
C.
Colorado
Colorado is a landlocked U.S. state known for its Rocky Mountain landscapes, outdoor recreation, and cities like Denver and Boulder.
-
D.
Coahuila y Tejas
Coahuila y Tejas was a Mexican state in the early 19th century that combined the regions of Coahuila and Texas before Texas’s independence and the formation of the Republic of Texas.
-
E.
Nevada
Nevada is a western U.S. state known for its vast deserts, legalized gambling, and the entertainment hub of Las Vegas.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a24c8150408190910a693eb51c1f71 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:01 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a2567dd770819088eb77ffc6d2d1cf |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:44 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69a413ec957c8190a6f712556ea121cc |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:24 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:06 a.m.