Triple
T8603329
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | RFC 1441 |
E203732
|
entity |
| Predicate | relatedTo |
P37
|
FINISHED |
| Object | RFC 1447 |
E198871
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: RFC 1447 | Statement: [RFC 1441, relatedTo, RFC 1447]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: RFC 1447 Context triple: [RFC 1441, relatedTo, RFC 1447]
-
A.
RFC 1447
chosen
RFC 1447 is an early Internet standards document that specified mechanisms for managing SNMPv2 network management protocols before being superseded by later revisions.
-
B.
RFC 1441
RFC 1441 is an early standards-track document in the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) framework that was later superseded by RFC 1901 as the protocol evolved.
-
C.
RFC 1449
RFC 1449 is an early Internet standards document that specified a version of the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) used for managing devices on IP networks.
-
D.
RFC 1446
RFC 1446 is an early Internet standards document that defined mechanisms for managing network devices using the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) before being superseded by later revisions.
-
E.
RFC 1497
RFC 1497 is an early Internet standards document that defined vendor-specific extensions for the BOOTP protocol, laying groundwork later incorporated into DHCP.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca832b56948190ba751cec255308f1 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:05 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cc46dc23448190a5eb63455578427e |
completed | March 31, 2026, 10:12 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69cea8f8dfa4819080c8ed475a84be41 |
completed | April 2, 2026, 5:35 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:24 p.m.