Triple
T8602521
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Robert Schumann: Fantasiestücke, Op. 12 |
E203712
|
entity |
| Predicate | keyOfMovement6 |
P83455
|
FINISHED |
| Object | G minor |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: G minor | Statement: [Robert Schumann: Fantasiestücke, Op. 12, keyOfMovement6, G minor]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: keyOfMovement6 Context triple: [Robert Schumann: Fantasiestücke, Op. 12, keyOfMovement6, G minor]
-
A.
keyOfPiece6
Indicates that something specifies or represents the musical key associated with piece number 6.
-
B.
keyOfSixthPiece
chosen
Indicates the musical key in which the sixth piece in a sequence or collection is written.
-
C.
movement1Key
Indicates a relationship where an entity’s primary or defining movement action or motion pattern is specified or referenced.
-
D.
keyOfFifthMovement
Indicates the musical key in which the fifth movement of a work is composed.
-
E.
movement5Key
Indicates a relationship where an entity’s movement is characterized or controlled by a specific “5-key” input or pattern (such as a five-key control scheme or movement mode).
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca832b56948190ba751cec255308f1 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:05 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cc46da609881909a6d851915e8df14 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 10:12 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cc454eb2908190acf0e4336bc67e7b |
completed | March 31, 2026, 10:06 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:24 p.m.