Triple
T8569224
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Rebel Diamonds |
E202883
|
entity |
| Predicate | producer |
P490
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Shawn Everett |
E736231
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Shawn Everett | Statement: [Rebel Diamonds, producer, Shawn Everett]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Shawn Everett Context triple: [Rebel Diamonds, producer, Shawn Everett]
-
A.
Shawn Everett
chosen
Shawn Everett is a Grammy-winning Canadian audio engineer and record producer known for his innovative, experimental approach to recording and mixing for artists across rock, pop, and alternative music.
-
B.
Shawn Matthews
Shawn Matthews is a senior executive associated with the financial services firm Cantor Fitzgerald.
-
C.
Shawn
Shawn is a given name, typically a variant of the name John or Sean, used primarily in English-speaking countries.
-
D.
Shawn Eichman
Shawn Eichman is an American political activist best known as a defendant in the landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down federal prohibitions on flag desecration as unconstitutional.
-
E.
Shawn Sanford
Shawn Sanford is an American Microsoft executive known publicly as the longtime partner and husband of actress Poppy Montgomery.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca8327b0a881908606ff860713964d |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:05 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cbea3f28608190a07be8b324669a12 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 3:37 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69cef3265be481909acfef718e2bd403 |
completed | April 2, 2026, 10:52 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:21 p.m.