Triple

T8561064
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject NIA Special Courts E202690 entity
Predicate canTryConnectedOffences P67292 FINISHED
Object true LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [NIA Special Courts, canTryConnectedOffences, true]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: canTryConnectedOffences
Context triple: [NIA Special Courts, canTryConnectedOffences, true]
  • A. canTry
    Indicates that an entity has the possibility or permission to attempt performing a particular action or achieving a certain outcome.
  • B. includesAttemptedAndCompletedOffenses
    Indicates that the relationship or count covers both offenses that were merely attempted and those that were fully completed.
  • C. definesOffence
    Indicates that one entity specifies or establishes the nature, elements, or scope of an offence associated with another entity.
  • D. supportsMultipleOffensesPerIncident chosen
    Indicates that a single incident can be associated with, or give rise to, more than one distinct offense.
  • E. isForConvictedOffenders
    Indicates that something is intended to apply to, be used by, or be relevant for individuals who have been legally convicted of offenses.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca8326e6c881908ff720d6abaebdc5 completed March 30, 2026, 2:05 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cbe94af14481908b8762e0dc61f10f completed March 31, 2026, 3:33 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cbd1160fcc8190aa380a73610af731 completed March 31, 2026, 1:50 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:20 p.m.