Triple
T8549368
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Kuruntokai |
E202406
|
entity |
| Predicate | editorialHistory |
P83259
|
FINISHED |
| Object | subject of modern critical editions |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: subject of modern critical editions | Statement: [Kuruntokai, editorialHistory, subject of modern critical editions]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: editorialHistory Context triple: [Kuruntokai, editorialHistory, subject of modern critical editions]
-
A.
editedBy
Indicates that one entity has revised, modified, or otherwise made editorial changes to another entity.
-
B.
editorialNote
Indicates that there is an accompanying editorial comment or clarification about the related content, typically added by an editor rather than the original author.
-
C.
editorialProcess
Indicates the process by which content is reviewed, revised, and approved before publication or release.
-
D.
editorialControl
Indicates that one entity has the authority to direct, modify, or approve the content or presentation produced by another entity.
-
E.
editorialManagement
Indicates the relationship in which one party oversees, coordinates, or directs the editorial processes, decisions, and content production of another.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca832610e08190b3b6c6cd2c250255 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:05 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cbe753d3608190b0573477182cf194 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 3:25 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cbd113e05c81908f4f3fc1b5925164 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 1:50 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69cbe30d453481908f897ed2b06e7534 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 3:06 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:19 p.m.