Triple

T8535710
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Rule XXI E202071 entity
Predicate usesReasoningStyle P83192 FINISHED
Object deductive reasoning LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: deductive reasoning | Statement: [Rule XXI, usesReasoningStyle, deductive reasoning]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usesReasoningStyle
Context triple: [Rule XXI, usesReasoningStyle, deductive reasoning]
  • A. hasDecisionMakingStyle
    Indicates that an entity possesses or exhibits a particular way or pattern of making decisions.
  • B. usesIntelligence
    Indicates that an entity applies mental abilities such as reasoning, problem-solving, or understanding to perform an action or achieve a goal.
  • C. hasReasoningComplexity
    Indicates that an action, process, or decision involves a certain level or type of cognitive or logical complexity in its reasoning.
  • D. decisionStyle
    Indicates the characteristic way an entity approaches, processes, and makes decisions in a given context.
  • E. usesEpistemicMeans
    Indicates that an agent employs knowledge-related methods, reasoning, or informational tools as the means to carry out or support an action or relationship.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca832355b08190b8b6a4ab4a4a3554 completed March 30, 2026, 2:05 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cbe6a295c88190a432a060ee73f04e completed March 31, 2026, 3:22 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cbd111bf988190be98c92a607c6456 completed March 31, 2026, 1:50 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69cbe30d453481908f897ed2b06e7534 completed March 31, 2026, 3:06 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:17 p.m.