Triple

T8534288
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Jerry Seeman E202036 entity
Predicate appointedDirectorOfOfficiating P8553 FINISHED
Object 1991 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 1991 | Statement: [Jerry Seeman, appointedDirectorOfOfficiating, 1991]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: appointedDirectorOfOfficiating
Context triple: [Jerry Seeman, appointedDirectorOfOfficiating, 1991]
  • A. appointedAs chosen
    Indicates that one entity is formally assigned or designated to hold a specific role, position, or title in relation to another entity.
  • B. conferenceCommissioner
    Indicates that an entity serves as the commissioner (governing or overseeing authority) of a particular conference.
  • C. appointedOver
    Indicates that one entity has been formally assigned authority, responsibility, or a supervisory role over another entity.
  • D. appointedWith
    Indicates that one entity has been formally assigned or designated to a role, position, or responsibility in relation to another entity.
  • E. leagueCommissioner
    Indicates that one entity serves as the commissioner (governing or overseeing authority) of a particular league involving the other entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca832355b08190b8b6a4ab4a4a3554 completed March 30, 2026, 2:05 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cbe6a0ccd4819097b41d0dfb1c5018 completed March 31, 2026, 3:22 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cbd111bf988190be98c92a607c6456 completed March 31, 2026, 1:50 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:17 p.m.