Triple
T8510741
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Critias |
E201445
|
entity |
| Predicate | relative |
P37
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Charmides |
E39650
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Charmides | Statement: [Critias, relative, Charmides]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Charmides Context triple: [Critias, relative, Charmides]
-
A.
Charmides
chosen
Charmides is a Socratic dialogue by Plato that explores the nature of temperance or self-control through a philosophical conversation between Socrates and the young Charmides.
-
B.
Adeimantus
Adeimantus is a prominent interlocutor in Plato’s Republic, known for his probing questions about justice, education, and the ideal state.
-
C.
Therimachus
Therimachus is a lesser-known figure in Greek mythology, traditionally mentioned as one of the children of the hero Heracles and his wife Deianira.
-
D.
Echecrates
Echecrates is a Pythagorean philosopher who appears in Plato’s dialogue "Phaedo" as the interlocutor to whom Phaedo recounts the final conversation and death of Socrates.
-
E.
Menexenus (Plato)
Menexenus (Plato) is one of Plato’s shorter Socratic dialogues, notable for its satirical treatment of Athenian funeral orations and reflections on rhetoric and civic identity.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca8320e5748190ac2c585a0bba8193 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:05 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cbe608e5b08190a6d551793e8ed94b |
completed | March 31, 2026, 3:19 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69cf423bade4819094204d98303093c8 |
completed | April 3, 2026, 4:29 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:15 p.m.