Triple
T8507813
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Womp Womp |
E201375
|
entity |
| Predicate | vocalDeliveryType |
P9331
|
FINISHED |
| Object | mumbled and understated |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: mumbled and understated | Statement: [Womp Womp, vocalDeliveryType, mumbled and understated]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: vocalDeliveryType Context triple: [Womp Womp, vocalDeliveryType, mumbled and understated]
-
A.
vocalizationMethod
chosen
Indicates the manner or technique by which an entity produces a sound or vocal expression.
-
B.
voiceType
Indicates the specific vocal style, quality, or role associated with an entity’s voice in a given context.
-
C.
vocalizationCharacteristic
Indicates how an entity’s vocal sounds are characterized, such as their quality, style, or distinctive acoustic features.
-
D.
voiceAppearance
Indicates that one entity’s voice is present, heard, or featured in association with another entity (such as a work, scene, or medium).
-
E.
vocalHarmonyType
Indicates the specific kind or style of vocal harmony relationship that exists between the involved vocal parts or voices.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca8320e5748190ac2c585a0bba8193 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:05 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cbe5de18448190a695eec609b34e1a |
completed | March 31, 2026, 3:18 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cbd10cfd208190a519049fad32c508 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 1:50 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:14 p.m.