Triple
T85017
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Agricultural Adjustment Administration |
E1710
|
entity |
| Predicate | usedPolicyInstrument |
P1652
|
FINISHED |
| Object | price supports |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: price supports | Statement: [Agricultural Adjustment Administration, usedPolicyInstrument, price supports]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usedPolicyInstrument Context triple: [Agricultural Adjustment Administration, usedPolicyInstrument, price supports]
-
A.
implementedPolicy
Indicates that a particular policy has been put into effect or carried out by an entity.
-
B.
policyTool
chosen
Indicates that an entity is a tool, mechanism, or instrument used to design, implement, or enforce a policy.
-
C.
usesInstrument
Indicates that an agent performs an action by employing a specific instrument or tool as the means to carry it out.
-
D.
supportsPolicy
Indicates that one entity endorses, backs, or is in favor of a particular policy or set of policies.
-
E.
governingPolicy
Indicates that one entity serves as the authoritative policy or set of rules that directs, constrains, or regulates the behavior, operation, or decisions of another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a24c8150408190910a693eb51c1f71 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:01 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a250e401288190ba12322c9c5f07c9 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:20 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a24eb59e808190811c20518f39b1cc |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:11 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:06 a.m.