Triple

T8491613
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject A359 E200982 entity
Predicate associatedWithIATATypeCode P83013 FINISHED
Object 359 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 359 | Statement: [A359, associatedWithIATATypeCode, 359]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: associatedWithIATATypeCode
Context triple: [A359, associatedWithIATATypeCode, 359]
  • A. associatedWithIATAAirlineCode
    Indicates that an entity is linked to or identified by a specific IATA airline code.
  • B. hasIATAcode
    Indicates that an entity, typically a transportation facility like an airport, is associated with a specific IATA (International Air Transport Association) code.
  • C. associatedAirlineType
    Indicates a relationship where an airline is linked to a specific classification or type (e.g., carrier category or operational class).
  • D. associatedWithICAOcode
    Indicates a relationship where an entity is linked to, or identified by, a specific ICAO (International Civil Aviation Organization) code.
  • E. associatedWithAirportType
    Indicates that an entity has a connection or linkage to a specific category or type of airport.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca831ee390819095fae73400bbfafc completed March 30, 2026, 2:05 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cbe55af3f48190a8cd64cdce0ebd4c completed March 31, 2026, 3:16 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cbd107633c8190a36ba50e07876918 completed March 31, 2026, 1:49 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69cbe30d453481908f897ed2b06e7534 completed March 31, 2026, 3:06 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:13 p.m.