Triple
T8488766
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Yin & Yang |
E200901
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasTitle |
P38
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Yin & Yang |
E200901
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Yin & Yang | Statement: [Yin & Yang, hasTitle, Yin & Yang]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Yin & Yang Context triple: [Yin & Yang, hasTitle, Yin & Yang]
-
A.
Yin & Yang
chosen
"Yin & Yang" is a track from the album "China," likely drawing on the traditional Chinese philosophical concept of dualistic balance and harmony.
-
B.
yin and yang
Yin and yang is a fundamental Chinese philosophical concept describing how seemingly opposite or contrary forces are interconnected, interdependent, and complementary aspects of a unified whole.
-
C.
Yin
Yin was the last and most prominent capital city of China’s Shang dynasty, serving as its political and cultural center.
-
D.
Tao
Tao is the central, ineffable principle in Chinese philosophy and religion, especially Taoism, representing the fundamental way or path underlying the universe and natural order.
-
E.
Tao
Tao is a Chinese surname shared by numerous individuals, including the renowned mathematician Terence Tao.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca831d7b148190a6e32c1de43ab13b |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:05 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cbe5581d308190b47d76dd49a36529 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 3:16 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69ce3a4e5be48190b5c598123ef75f8b |
completed | April 2, 2026, 9:43 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:13 p.m.