Triple

T8483426
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject TOS E200571 entity
Predicate typicallyWrittenAs P5330 FINISHED
Object legal document LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: legal document | Statement: [TOS, typicallyWrittenAs, legal document]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typicallyWrittenAs
Context triple: [TOS, typicallyWrittenAs, legal document]
  • A. alsoWrittenAs chosen
    Indicates that one entity has an alternative written form, spelling, or notation represented by the other entity.
  • B. nameWrittenIn
    Indicates that an entity’s name is written or recorded using a specified language, script, or writing system.
  • C. laterWrittenDownAs
    Indicates that something was recorded or documented in written form at a subsequent time after its original occurrence or expression.
  • D. writingSystemStandardized
    Indicates that a writing system has been formally codified and regulated according to an accepted standard or set of rules.
  • E. oftenUsedAsNameFor
    Indicates that something frequently serves as a name or designation for another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca831b17988190a1f3f3413d57b820 completed March 30, 2026, 2:05 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cbe53845e881909eeb32863c7aa942 completed March 31, 2026, 3:16 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cbd107633c8190a36ba50e07876918 completed March 31, 2026, 1:49 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:12 p.m.