Triple
T847799
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Mono people |
E18314
|
entity |
| Predicate | uses |
P98
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Mono language |
E100285
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Mono language | Statement: [Mono people, uses, Mono language]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Mono language Context triple: [Mono people, uses, Mono language]
-
A.
Mono language
chosen
Mono language is a Native American Uto-Aztecan language traditionally spoken by the Mono people of eastern California.
-
B.
Ludian language
The Ludian language is a lesser-known Uralic language spoken by the Ludic people in northwestern Russia, traditionally seen as transitional between Karelian and Veps.
-
C.
Chimariko language
The Chimariko language is an extinct Native American language once spoken in northwestern California, often classified within the proposed Hokan language family.
-
D.
Unami language
The Unami language is an Eastern Algonquian Native American language traditionally spoken by the Lenape (Delaware) people in the mid-Atlantic region of the United States.
-
E.
Fang language
Fang is a Bantu language spoken primarily by the Fang people of Equatorial Guinea, Gabon, and Cameroon, notable for its significant influence on local varieties of Spanish and French.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a4938b04208190b82e1df6b572c548 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:29 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4ac1e41748190a21cd1ce5ebcb8ff |
completed | March 1, 2026, 9:14 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69a7a3bd8b588190b7a9eb72dce93d07 |
completed | March 4, 2026, 3:15 a.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:38 p.m.