Triple

T8474765
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Netherlands Antillean guilder E200361 entity
Predicate statusInSintMaarten P82821 FINISHED
Object legal tender LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: legal tender | Statement: [Netherlands Antillean guilder, statusInSintMaarten, legal tender]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: statusInSintMaarten
Context triple: [Netherlands Antillean guilder, statusInSintMaarten, legal tender]
  • A. statusInSuriname
    Indicates the legal, social, or official standing or condition that an entity holds within the context of Suriname.
  • B. statusInCNMI
    Indicates the legal or official status that an entity holds within the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI).
  • C. statusInSI
    Indicates that an entity’s status or condition is specified according to the International System of Units (SI) or an SI-based standard.
  • D. statusInRepublicOfIreland
    Indicates the legal or official status that an entity holds within the jurisdiction of the Republic of Ireland.
  • E. statusInFrance
    Indicates the legal, social, or official standing or condition that an entity has within the jurisdiction of France.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca831a4f348190bfdd09250e86ae35 completed March 30, 2026, 2:05 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cbe4f89e0081909e74beb7c8f55653 completed March 31, 2026, 3:15 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cbd104250c8190b4c499dcc9937494 completed March 31, 2026, 1:49 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69cbe12dd0b88190a38ec4d15dcc870b completed March 31, 2026, 2:58 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:11 p.m.