Triple
T8472584
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Amiga Fast File System (later versions) |
E200313
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | disk file system |
C2785
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: disk file system Context triple: [Amiga Fast File System (later versions), instanceOf, disk file system]
-
A.
FAT file system
A FAT file system is a simple, widely supported disk file system that organizes and manages files using a File Allocation Table to track the location and allocation status of data clusters on storage media.
-
B.
optical disc file system
An optical disc file system is a method of organizing and managing data stored on optical media (such as CDs, DVDs, and Blu-ray discs) so that operating systems can locate, read, and sometimes write files and directories.
-
C.
FAT file system variant
A FAT file system variant is a specific implementation or extension of the File Allocation Table architecture that defines how data is organized, stored, and managed on storage media, often differing in cluster size limits, maximum volume and file sizes, and supported features.
-
D.
flash-friendly file system
A flash-friendly file system is a storage management system designed to optimize performance, wear leveling, and reliability on flash memory devices by minimizing random writes and efficiently handling erase-block constraints.
-
E.
journaling file system
chosen
A journaling file system is a type of file system that records changes to a dedicated log (journal) before committing them to the main file system, improving reliability and recovery after crashes.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca831a4f348190bfdd09250e86ae35 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:05 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:11 p.m.