Triple

T8470936
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Zone Information Protocol E200277 entity
Predicate zoneNameEncoding P83494 FINISHED
Object up to 32 characters LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: up to 32 characters | Statement: [Zone Information Protocol, zoneNameEncoding, up to 32 characters]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: zoneNameEncoding
Context triple: [Zone Information Protocol, zoneNameEncoding, up to 32 characters]
  • A. exampleZoneName
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a zone identified by a specific example or placeholder name.
  • B. zoneCode
    Indicates that an entity is associated with, or assigned to, a specific geographic or administrative zone identified by a code.
  • C. zoneType
    Indicates the classification or category of a zone that specifies its type or functional designation.
  • D. zone
    Indicates that an entity is located within, associated with, or assigned to a particular geographic or conceptual area or zone.
  • E. zonedTo
    Indicates that one entity is assigned or designated to fall within the jurisdiction, service area, or regulatory zone of another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca831a4f348190bfdd09250e86ae35 completed March 30, 2026, 2:05 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cbe4f234c481909534de6fd702f4cf completed March 31, 2026, 3:14 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cbd10072cc819084be1ed9ac7ebe9d completed March 31, 2026, 1:49 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69cbe30c2d088190b4cb89adb4e88273 completed March 31, 2026, 3:06 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:11 p.m.