Triple
T8454776
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Aggie Code of Honor |
E199892
|
entity |
| Predicate | mottoRelation |
P25715
|
FINISHED |
| Object | reflects Texas A&M core values |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: reflects Texas A&M core values | Statement: [Aggie Code of Honor, mottoRelation, reflects Texas A&M core values]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: mottoRelation Context triple: [Aggie Code of Honor, mottoRelation, reflects Texas A&M core values]
-
A.
mottoType
Indicates the specific category or kind of motto that characterizes the relationship between an entity and its motto.
-
B.
mottoOriginalLanguage
Indicates the language in which a motto was originally formulated or expressed.
-
C.
mottoDerivedFrom
Indicates that one motto is derived, adapted, or taken from another source, such as a phrase, text, or earlier motto.
-
D.
isMottoOf
Indicates that a phrase or expression serves as the official motto associated with a particular entity.
-
E.
mottoEmphasizes
chosen
Indicates that a motto highlights, stresses, or gives special importance to a particular idea, value, or theme.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca8318231881908fd1bc1c4d45d286 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:05 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cbe48ca9988190b60ebd09a135194d |
completed | March 31, 2026, 3:13 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cbd0fc634481909842c0a30077bfde |
completed | March 31, 2026, 1:49 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:10 p.m.