Triple
T8445842
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Lour |
E199672
|
entity |
| Predicate | locatedIn |
P40
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Forfarshire |
E18123
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Forfarshire | Statement: [Lour, locatedIn, Forfarshire]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Forfarshire Context triple: [Lour, locatedIn, Forfarshire]
-
A.
Forfarshire
chosen
Forfarshire is the former historic name of the Scottish county now known as Angus.
-
B.
Cromartyshire
Cromartyshire was a historic county in the Scottish Highlands, known for its scattered enclaves and association with local clans such as Clan Urquhart.
-
C.
Dumfriesshire
Dumfriesshire is a historic county in the Southern Uplands of Scotland, known for its rural landscapes, market towns, and borderland history.
-
D.
Roxburghshire
Roxburghshire is a historic county in the Scottish Borders, known for its rich medieval heritage and notable monastic sites.
-
E.
Caithness
Caithness is a historic county in the far north of Scotland, known for its rugged coastline, Norse-Gaelic heritage, and long association with the Sinclair family.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca83170f9081909cd98f55614c6476 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:05 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cbe3152a3c819092efdeab718def7a |
completed | March 31, 2026, 3:07 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69cfab16ebd08190a4851e70a41e9908 |
completed | April 3, 2026, 11:57 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:09 p.m.