Triple
T8444844
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | North Munda languages |
E199647
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Munda languages subgroup |
C24387
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: Munda languages subgroup Context triple: [North Munda languages, instanceOf, Munda languages subgroup]
-
A.
Penutian languages subgroup
The Penutian languages subgroup is a proposed family of Native American languages, primarily spoken in western North America, that are hypothesized to share a common ancestral origin based on structural and lexical similarities.
-
B.
Munda language
The Munda language is a member of the Austroasiatic language family spoken primarily by indigenous Munda communities in eastern and central India, characterized by agglutinative morphology and distinct phonological features.
-
C.
Oto-Manguean language
An Oto-Manguean language is a member of a large, diverse family of indigenous Mesoamerican languages, primarily spoken in Mexico, characterized by complex tonal systems and significant grammatical and phonological variation.
-
D.
Bantoid languages
Bantoid languages are a branch of the Benue–Congo family within the Niger–Congo language phylum, comprising Bantu and closely related non-Bantu languages spoken primarily in Central and West Africa.
-
E.
subfamily of Tupian languages
A subfamily of Tupian languages is a smaller, genetically related group of languages within the larger Tupian family that share a more recent common ancestor and distinctive linguistic features.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca83170f9081909cd98f55614c6476 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:05 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:09 p.m.