Triple

T8442341
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Samuel A. Worcester E199578 entity
Predicate hasLegalCase P3010 FINISHED
Object Worcester v. Georgia E38721 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Worcester v. Georgia | Statement: [Samuel A. Worcester, hasLegalCase, Worcester v. Georgia]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Worcester v. Georgia
Context triple: [Samuel A. Worcester, hasLegalCase, Worcester v. Georgia]
  • A. Worcester v. Georgia chosen
    Worcester v. Georgia was an 1832 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court held that states had no authority to impose laws on Native American tribal lands, affirming tribal sovereignty in the face of federal Indian Removal policies.
  • B. Chisholm v. Georgia
    Chisholm v. Georgia was a 1793 U.S. Supreme Court case that held a state could be sued in federal court by a citizen of another state, a ruling that led directly to the adoption of the Eleventh Amendment limiting such suits.
  • C. Cherokee Nation v. Georgia
    Cherokee Nation v. Georgia was an 1831 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Cherokee Nation was a "domestic dependent nation" lacking standing to sue as a foreign nation, a ruling that shaped federal Indian law and the context of Indian Removal.
  • D. Paul v. Virginia
    Paul v. Virginia is an 1869 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held corporations are not “citizens” under the Constitution’s Privileges and Immunities Clause, allowing states to regulate foreign insurance companies.
  • E. Jackson v. Georgia
    Jackson v. Georgia is a United States Supreme Court case that, alongside Furman v. Georgia, addressed the constitutionality and application of the death penalty under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca83170f9081909cd98f55614c6476 completed March 30, 2026, 2:05 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cbe310d8e08190b871bda79acde678 completed March 31, 2026, 3:06 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69ce4dc163488190a53d8696fdba94b5 completed April 2, 2026, 11:06 a.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:08 p.m.