Triple
T8440
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | IRE Transactions on Military Electronics |
E167
|
entity |
| Predicate | peerReview |
P630
|
FINISHED |
| Object | yes |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [IRE Transactions on Military Electronics, peerReview, yes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: peerReview Context triple: [IRE Transactions on Military Electronics, peerReview, yes]
-
A.
publicationType
Indicates the specific category or format of a published work that characterizes how it is issued or presented.
-
B.
publishedIn
Indicates that a work (such as an article, paper, or book) has been formally released or made available within a specific venue, medium, or publication.
-
C.
submittedTo
Indicates that one entity has formally sent or presented something (such as a document, request, or work) to another entity for consideration, review, or processing.
-
D.
researchStrength
Indicates the degree to which an entity possesses strong capabilities, performance, or impact in conducting research.
-
E.
proposes
Indicates that one entity formally suggests or puts forward an idea, plan, or course of action to another entity for consideration or approval.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a23bb612708190b09f25385e4b63d1 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 12:49 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a2407916ac8190b76d2e6690efaef3 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:10 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a23fe3a87881909ab95bb3a0b474ec |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:07 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a240782e108190b6b60c26b84ae179 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:10 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 12:54 a.m.