Triple

T843411
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Shelley v. Kraemer E18225 entity
Predicate fullCaseName P3131 FINISHED
Object J.D. Shelley et ux. v. Louis Kraemer et ux. E18225 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: J.D. Shelley et ux. v. Louis Kraemer et ux. | Statement: [Shelley v. Kraemer, fullCaseName, J.D. Shelley et ux. v. Louis Kraemer et ux.]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: J.D. Shelley et ux. v. Louis Kraemer et ux.
Context triple: [Shelley v. Kraemer, fullCaseName, J.D. Shelley et ux. v. Louis Kraemer et ux.]
  • A. Shelley v. Kraemer chosen
    Shelley v. Kraemer is a landmark 1948 U.S. Supreme Court case that held courts could not enforce racially restrictive housing covenants, marking a major civil rights victory against residential segregation.
  • B. Corfield v. Coryell
    Corfield v. Coryell is an 1823 federal circuit court decision by Justice Bushrod Washington that famously articulated an influential early list of the fundamental rights protected by the U.S. Constitution’s Privileges and Immunities Clause.
  • C. Yamashita v. Styer
    Yamashita v. Styer is a landmark 1946 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the conviction of Japanese General Tomoyuki Yamashita and established the controversial "command responsibility" doctrine in international law.
  • D. Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins
    Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins is a 1989 U.S. Supreme Court case that established that employment decisions based on gender stereotyping violate federal anti-discrimination law and clarified the burden-shifting framework for mixed-motive discrimination claims.
  • E. Briggs v. Elliott
    Briggs v. Elliott was a landmark federal court case from South Carolina challenging racial segregation in public schools, and it became one of the key cases consolidated into Brown v. Board of Education.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a4938b04208190b82e1df6b572c548 completed March 1, 2026, 7:29 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4ac07fedc8190ab05595f25c1792f completed March 1, 2026, 9:13 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69a7929c8c9c8190a0279f347ab64765 completed March 4, 2026, 2:02 a.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:38 p.m.