Triple
T8428962
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | OMG |
E199071
|
entity |
| Predicate | album |
P1995
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Raymond v. Raymond |
E327603
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Raymond v. Raymond | Statement: [OMG, album, Raymond v. Raymond]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Raymond v. Raymond Context triple: [OMG, album, Raymond v. Raymond]
-
A.
Raymond v. Raymond
chosen
Raymond v. Raymond is a 2010 R&B studio album by American singer Usher that explores themes of love, heartbreak, and personal transformation.
-
B.
Ray v. Blair
Ray v. Blair is a 1952 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a state's authority to require presidential electors to pledge support for their party's nominees as a condition of appointment.
-
C.
Romer v. Evans
Romer v. Evans is a 1996 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down a Colorado constitutional amendment targeting gay, lesbian, and bisexual people as a violation of the Equal Protection Clause.
-
D.
Lucas v. Earl
Lucas v. Earl is a landmark 1930 U.S. Supreme Court tax law case that established the principle that income is taxed to the person who earns it, regardless of contractual arrangements to split or assign that income.
-
E.
Collin v. Smith
Collin v. Smith is a U.S. federal court case that addressed the constitutionality of local ordinances restricting a planned Nazi march in Skokie, Illinois, ultimately affirming strong First Amendment protections for offensive political speech.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca8313c99081909a5c6d83b91de5b3 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:05 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cbd125a53c8190b83a4f6148baa779 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 1:50 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69ce0376b4708190b2d118bcdf1a00fc |
completed | April 2, 2026, 5:49 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:07 p.m.