Triple

T8425631
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Showdown E198978 entity
Predicate dramaticIntensity P21486 FINISHED
Object high LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: high | Statement: [Showdown, dramaticIntensity, high]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: dramaticIntensity
Context triple: [Showdown, dramaticIntensity, high]
  • A. hasDramaticTone chosen
    Indicates that something (such as a work, scene, or expression) is characterized by a heightened, intense, or emotionally charged tone.
  • B. dramaticFunction
    Indicates the role or purpose that something serves within the structure or progression of a dramatic work or narrative.
  • C. dramaticImportance
    Indicates that one entity holds significant narrative or emotional weight or impact in relation to another within a dramatic or storytelling context.
  • D. hasDramaticStyle
    Indicates that an entity employs or is characterized by a theatrical, emotionally intense, or striking manner of expression or presentation.
  • E. hasDramaticElements
    Indicates that something contains features or qualities characteristic of drama, such as heightened emotion, tension, or conflict.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca8313c99081909a5c6d83b91de5b3 completed March 30, 2026, 2:05 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cb85a2871081908a4093838fc93b5a completed March 31, 2026, 8:28 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cb70d7ea348190aafbf8ca02b7b7d5 completed March 31, 2026, 6:59 a.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:07 p.m.