Triple
T8414160
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | FFSv2 |
E198692
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Fast File System variant |
C24306
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: Fast File System variant Context triple: [FFSv2, instanceOf, Fast File System variant]
-
A.
flash-friendly file system
A flash-friendly file system is a storage management system designed to optimize performance, wear leveling, and reliability on flash memory devices by minimizing random writes and efficiently handling erase-block constraints.
-
B.
FAT file system variant
A FAT file system variant is a specific implementation or extension of the File Allocation Table architecture that defines how data is organized, stored, and managed on storage media, often differing in cluster size limits, maximum volume and file sizes, and supported features.
-
C.
FAT file system
A FAT file system is a simple, widely supported disk file system that organizes and manages files using a File Allocation Table to track the location and allocation status of data clusters on storage media.
-
D.
copy-on-write file system
A copy-on-write file system is a storage system that defers data copying until modification, allowing snapshots and efficient versioning by sharing unchanged data blocks between files or system states.
-
E.
file system support mechanism
A file system support mechanism is an underlying component or service that manages how data is stored, organized, accessed, and maintained on storage devices within an operating system.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca831201b481909e137936ef99ff11 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:05 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:06 p.m.