Triple
T8413673
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Apollo Computer |
E198680
|
entity |
| Predicate | primaryCustomerSegment |
P809
|
FINISHED |
| Object | engineering firms |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: engineering firms | Statement: [Apollo Computer, primaryCustomerSegment, engineering firms]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: primaryCustomerSegment Context triple: [Apollo Computer, primaryCustomerSegment, engineering firms]
-
A.
majorCustomer
Indicates that one entity is a primary or high-value customer of another entity, typically contributing a significant portion of business or revenue.
-
B.
primaryUserType
Indicates the main or dominant category of user associated with an entity or interaction.
-
C.
primaryPatientType
Indicates the main category or classification of patient that is primarily associated with or targeted by an entity, action, or service.
-
D.
customerType
chosen
Indicates the classification or category assigned to a customer based on their characteristics, status, or relationship with a business.
-
E.
secondaryCustomer
Indicates a relationship where one customer is designated as an additional or subordinate customer associated with a primary customer in a given context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca831201b481909e137936ef99ff11 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:05 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cb83e328cc8190b3b038005d0bb66f |
completed | March 31, 2026, 8:20 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cb70d473dc8190af8ea81ee5aa970d |
completed | March 31, 2026, 6:59 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:06 p.m.