Triple

T8413334
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Human68k E198673 entity
Predicate supportsHardDisks P33362 FINISHED
Object yes LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Human68k, supportsHardDisks, yes]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supportsHardDisks
Context triple: [Human68k, supportsHardDisks, yes]
  • A. hasInternalHardDrive
    Indicates that one entity possesses an internal hard drive as a built-in storage component.
  • B. supportsPhysicalMedia
    Indicates that one entity provides the capability to use, read, or handle physical media formats (such as discs, tapes, or printed materials) associated with another entity.
  • C. supportsExternalDrive chosen
    Indicates that one entity is capable of working with, recognizing, or providing functionality for an external storage drive.
  • D. supportsInstallationMedia
    Indicates that one entity is capable of accepting, handling, or working with a specified type of installation media for setup or deployment purposes.
  • E. hasHardwareCompatibilityWith
    Indicates that two hardware components or systems can operate together correctly and reliably without conflicts or incompatibilities.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca831201b481909e137936ef99ff11 completed March 30, 2026, 2:05 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cb83e18e7c8190a30b14136dee3d93 completed March 31, 2026, 8:20 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cb70d473dc8190af8ea81ee5aa970d completed March 31, 2026, 6:59 a.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:06 p.m.