Triple
T840780
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Catherine II of Russia |
E18170
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalReform |
P4888
|
FINISHED |
| Object | convened the Legislative Commission (1767) |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: convened the Legislative Commission (1767) | Statement: [Catherine II of Russia, legalReform, convened the Legislative Commission (1767)]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalReform Context triple: [Catherine II of Russia, legalReform, convened the Legislative Commission (1767)]
-
A.
reform
chosen
Indicates bringing about significant changes to an existing system, practice, or entity in order to improve or correct it.
-
B.
legalAct
Indicates that an entity performs, enacts, or is involved in a formal legal action, measure, or proceeding under a legal framework.
-
C.
relatedLegislation
Indicates that there exists a legislative document that is connected to, affects, or is otherwise relevant to the subject entity.
-
D.
legalAbolition
Indicates that a law, practice, or legal status has been formally ended or revoked through an official legal process.
-
E.
legalDoctrineChallenged
Indicates that a particular legal doctrine is being disputed, questioned, or contested, typically through litigation or formal legal argument.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a49389f44881909a608fb27d89f247 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:29 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4abe5d7848190b15e0cb343b6f4ba |
completed | March 1, 2026, 9:13 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4aa7dfc5c8190890c9df485d73a86 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 9:07 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:38 p.m.