Triple
T839
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Mens et Manus |
E16
|
entity |
| Predicate | translatedAs |
P15
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Mind and Hand |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Mind and Hand | Statement: [Mens et Manus, translatedAs, Mind and Hand]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: translatedAs Context triple: [Mens et Manus, translatedAs, Mind and Hand]
-
A.
nativeLanguage
Indicates the language that a person or entity originally learned and uses as their primary or first language.
-
B.
languageOfWorkOrName
chosen
Indicates the language in which a work is created or a name is expressed.
-
C.
recognizedLanguage
Indicates that an entity has identified, detected, or acknowledged a particular language as being used or present.
-
D.
deFactoLanguage
Indicates that a language is used in practice as the primary or common language in a context, even if it has no official legal status there.
-
E.
officialLanguage
Indicates that a particular language has been formally designated by an authority as the official language used for government, legal, or administrative purposes in a given jurisdiction.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a22a285828819081a58308fb963df1 |
completed | Feb. 27, 2026, 11:35 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a23344daf8819083118bbac5f46568 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 12:13 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a232e52e7c81909c072703e28e8c61 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 12:12 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 27, 2026, 11:36 p.m.