Triple
T8337297
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Wisconsin Highway 23 |
E195819
|
entity |
| Predicate | routeNumberInState |
P28856
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 23 in Wisconsin State Trunk Highway system |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 23 in Wisconsin State Trunk Highway system | Statement: [Wisconsin Highway 23, routeNumberInState, 23 in Wisconsin State Trunk Highway system]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: routeNumberInState Context triple: [Wisconsin Highway 23, routeNumberInState, 23 in Wisconsin State Trunk Highway system]
-
A.
routeNumber
Indicates the specific identifying number assigned to a route within a transportation or delivery network.
-
B.
stateRouteDesignation
chosen
Indicates the specific state-level route number or designation assigned to a roadway within a state highway system.
-
C.
parentRouteNumber
Indicates that one route is the immediate higher-level or containing route from which another route is derived or subordinated.
-
D.
routeNumberFormat
Indicates how the identifying number or code for a route is structured or formatted.
-
E.
routeNumberInAlberta
Indicates that a specified route or highway has a particular designated route number within the province of Alberta.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca82ecbdc481908a55cad8ca062d88 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:04 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cb7fd5027c81909724f25aa30bbe58 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 8:03 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cb70c3231c81909e3d463192c9de22 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 6:59 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:57 p.m.