Triple

T8283034
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Footnote Four in United States v. Carolene Products Co. E193724 entity
Predicate citedAs P771 FINISHED
Object Carolene Products Footnote Four E193724 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Carolene Products Footnote Four | Statement: [Footnote Four in United States v. Carolene Products Co., citedAs, Carolene Products Footnote Four]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Carolene Products Footnote Four
Context triple: [Footnote Four in United States v. Carolene Products Co., citedAs, Carolene Products Footnote Four]
  • A. Footnote Four in United States v. Carolene Products Co. chosen
    Footnote Four in United States v. Carolene Products Co. is a famous passage in a 1938 Supreme Court opinion suggesting that certain types of legislation—especially those affecting discrete and insular minorities or fundamental rights—may warrant more rigorous judicial scrutiny than ordinary economic regulation.
  • B. Noerr-Pennington doctrine
    The Noerr-Pennington doctrine is a U.S. legal principle that shields individuals and entities from antitrust liability when they petition the government, even if their efforts have anticompetitive effects.
  • C. International Shoe Co. v. Washington
    International Shoe Co. v. Washington is a landmark 1945 U.S. Supreme Court decision that established the modern "minimum contacts" standard for determining when a state may exercise personal jurisdiction over an out-of-state defendant.
  • D. Learned Hand
    Learned Hand was a highly influential American federal judge renowned for his incisive opinions on constitutional and tax law and his lasting impact on U.S. jurisprudence.
  • E. Ex parte Young
    Ex parte Young is a landmark 1908 U.S. Supreme Court decision that created a legal fiction allowing suits in federal court against state officials to stop ongoing violations of federal law, despite state sovereign immunity under the Eleventh Amendment.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca82e217a48190880695635c44b2ed completed March 30, 2026, 2:04 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cb7aceec8881909cdfa488dfedc0f5 completed March 31, 2026, 7:42 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69cd6877b8e481908ec1e0b91a5276f6 completed April 1, 2026, 6:48 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:51 p.m.