Triple

T827714
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Vox E17891 entity
Predicate gainedParliamentaryRepresentationIn P7697 FINISHED
Object 2019 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 2019 | Statement: [Vox, gainedParliamentaryRepresentationIn, 2019]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: gainedParliamentaryRepresentationIn
Context triple: [Vox, gainedParliamentaryRepresentationIn, 2019]
  • A. servedInParliamentFor
    Indicates that a person held a parliamentary seat as a representative of a specified constituency, region, or jurisdiction.
  • B. wonParliamentaryElection chosen
    Indicates that one party or candidate achieved victory in a parliamentary election over others.
  • C. areRepresentedIn
    Indicates that one entity serves as a representation, depiction, or encoding of another entity within a given medium, context, or system.
  • D. hasMemberOfParliament
    Indicates that an entity is represented by a specific individual serving as its Member of Parliament.
  • E. parliamentaryConstituencyRepresented
    Indicates the relationship in which a person or entity serves as the elected representative for a specific parliamentary constituency.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a4937c9c188190aaa216f6b466f452 completed March 1, 2026, 7:29 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4ab99b1e48190afad1f073348b29a completed March 1, 2026, 9:11 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a4aa79a6488190a634388e071ed9b7 completed March 1, 2026, 9:07 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:38 p.m.