Triple
T8276237
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | The Right to Privacy (Harvard Law Review article, 1890) |
E193553
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalTheory |
P10240
|
FINISHED |
| Object | privacy as a distinct legal interest |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: privacy as a distinct legal interest | Statement: [The Right to Privacy (Harvard Law Review article, 1890), legalTheory, privacy as a distinct legal interest]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalTheory Context triple: [The Right to Privacy (Harvard Law Review article, 1890), legalTheory, privacy as a distinct legal interest]
-
A.
legalDoctrine
Indicates that one legal principle, rule, or theory is being applied, referenced, or relied upon as an authoritative basis for interpreting or deciding a legal issue.
-
B.
legalPhilosophy
Indicates the philosophical principles, theories, or viewpoints that underpin or guide a legal system, doctrine, or interpretation.
-
C.
lawLibrary
Indicates a relationship where a location or resource functions as a library specifically dedicated to legal materials, services, or research.
-
D.
legalConcept
chosen
Indicates a relationship where something is classified or treated as a concept defined and governed by law or legal theory.
-
E.
lawJournal
Indicates a relationship where a work is published in, associated with, or appears within a specific law journal.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca82e14ae481908ffdb822cd2192bc |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:04 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cb798d69508190b581ad8a38730175 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 7:36 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cb70a4525481909399d313a6247ace |
completed | March 31, 2026, 6:58 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:51 p.m.