Triple

T827600
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Law and Justice E17889 entity
Predicate hasHeldOffice P1827 FINISHED
Object ruling party of Poland LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: ruling party of Poland | Statement: [Law and Justice, hasHeldOffice, ruling party of Poland]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasHeldOffice
Context triple: [Law and Justice, hasHeldOffice, ruling party of Poland]
  • A. succeededInOffice
    Indicates that one officeholder directly followed another in holding the same official position.
  • B. heldJudicialPositionIn
    Indicates that an entity served in an official judicial role or office within a specified jurisdiction or court.
  • C. officePreviouslyHeldBy
    Indicates that a particular office or position was formerly occupied by a specified person or entity.
  • D. memberHoldsOffice
    Indicates that a member occupies or serves in a specific official position or office within an organization or governing body.
  • E. servedAs chosen
    Indicates that one entity held and performed the role, position, or function associated with another entity for some period of time.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a4937c9c188190aaa216f6b466f452 completed March 1, 2026, 7:29 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4ab99b1e48190afad1f073348b29a completed March 1, 2026, 9:11 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a4aa79a6488190a634388e071ed9b7 completed March 1, 2026, 9:07 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:38 p.m.