Triple
T826895
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Tynwald |
E17873
|
entity |
| Predicate | claimsAttribute |
P16616
|
FINISHED |
| Object | one of the oldest continuous parliaments in the world |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: one of the oldest continuous parliaments in the world | Statement: [Tynwald, claimsAttribute, one of the oldest continuous parliaments in the world]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: claimsAttribute Context triple: [Tynwald, claimsAttribute, one of the oldest continuous parliaments in the world]
-
A.
attributeClaim
chosen
Indicates that one entity asserts or specifies a particular attribute or property about another entity.
-
B.
claimedFor
Indicates that one entity has asserted ownership, responsibility, or entitlement over or on behalf of another entity.
-
C.
supportsClaim
Indicates that one entity provides evidence, reasoning, or backing that strengthens or validates the truth or credibility of another entity’s claim.
-
D.
claimsToFollow
Indicates that one entity asserts or professes adherence to the principles, rules, or leadership of another entity.
-
E.
claimed
Indicates that an entity has asserted or stated something as true, often without definitive proof or verification.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a4937c9c188190aaa216f6b466f452 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:29 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4ab989748819091a3809a747a1c5b |
completed | March 1, 2026, 9:11 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4aa781e1081909df006f730296c53 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 9:07 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:38 p.m.