Triple
T8262097
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Article IV territorial court |
E193216
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalDoctrine |
P4756
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Insular Cases |
E417275
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Insular Cases | Statement: [Article IV territorial court, legalDoctrine, Insular Cases]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Insular Cases Context triple: [Article IV territorial court, legalDoctrine, Insular Cases]
-
A.
Insular Cases
chosen
The Insular Cases are a series of early 20th-century U.S. Supreme Court decisions that defined the constitutional status and rights of residents in American overseas territories.
-
B.
Slaughter-House Cases
The Slaughter-House Cases were an 1873 U.S. Supreme Court decision that narrowly interpreted the Fourteenth Amendment’s Privileges or Immunities Clause, significantly limiting its protection of civil rights against state infringement.
-
C.
Martin v. Hunter's Lessee
Martin v. Hunter's Lessee is an 1816 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the Court's authority to review state court decisions on federal law, reinforcing federal judicial supremacy.
-
D.
Gibbons v. Ogden
Gibbons v. Ogden was an 1824 U.S. Supreme Court case that broadly affirmed federal power over interstate commerce, significantly strengthening national authority relative to the states.
-
E.
Ableman v. Booth
Ableman v. Booth was an 1859 U.S. Supreme Court case that affirmed federal supremacy over state courts in enforcing the Fugitive Slave Act before the Civil War.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca82e081d48190986beaa51f498ab9 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:04 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cb7938723081909379cf78a4449b80 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 7:35 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69cd3573cee48190b72bdcdc433db93e |
completed | April 1, 2026, 3:10 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:49 p.m.