Triple

T8254917
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Cherokee syllabary E193047 entity
Predicate phonologicalUnitRepresented P44421 FINISHED
Object syllable LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: syllable | Statement: [Cherokee syllabary, phonologicalUnitRepresented, syllable]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: phonologicalUnitRepresented
Context triple: [Cherokee syllabary, phonologicalUnitRepresented, syllable]
  • A. hasPhonologicalBasisFor
    Indicates that one entity serves as the phonological source, motivation, or foundation for another entity.
  • B. phoneticValue chosen
    Indicates a relationship where a symbol, sign, or written element is associated with the specific sound or sequence of sounds it represents.
  • C. graphemicUnit
    Indicates a relationship where one element functions as a basic written symbol or character unit within a writing system.
  • D. hasPhonologicalDescription
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific representation or description of its sound structure or phonological form.
  • E. phoneticComponents
    Indicates that one entity serves as a phonetic component or contributes to the pronunciation of another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca82dfad9c8190b8cd18fb89f50f40 completed March 30, 2026, 2:04 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cb78f8eccc8190b43204bf2f8defc1 completed March 31, 2026, 7:34 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cb36b6d5548190b665a6cce14c69f7 completed March 31, 2026, 2:51 a.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:48 p.m.