Triple
T8246887
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | APT |
E192870
|
entity |
| Predicate | supportsHTTPSRepositories |
P81169
|
FINISHED |
| Object | yes |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [APT, supportsHTTPSRepositories, yes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supportsHTTPSRepositories Context triple: [APT, supportsHTTPSRepositories, yes]
-
A.
hasRepositoryMirror
Indicates that one repository serves as a mirrored copy or synchronized duplicate of another repository.
-
B.
hasPackageRepository
Indicates that an entity is associated with or provides access to a specific software package repository.
-
C.
supportsPreReleaseVersions
Indicates that one entity is capable of handling, accepting, or working with pre-release or non-final versions of another entity.
-
D.
supportsRepositoryScope
Indicates that one entity provides or allows functionality to be applied at the level of an entire repository rather than to individual items within it.
-
E.
supportsGitIntegration
Indicates that one entity provides functionality or compatibility that allows integration with Git for version control operations.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca82de7b8c81908d8106f8a53cff9b |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:04 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cb787414508190a08cf47d1545ce50 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 7:32 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cb36b437e881909958591357e83b9d |
completed | March 31, 2026, 2:51 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69cb447c146081909decf97bbd26c496 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 3:50 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:48 p.m.