Triple
T8246884
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | APT |
E192870
|
entity |
| Predicate | supportsDependencyResolution |
P203
|
FINISHED |
| Object | yes |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [APT, supportsDependencyResolution, yes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supportsDependencyResolution Context triple: [APT, supportsDependencyResolution, yes]
-
A.
supportsTransitiveDependencies
Indicates that an entity provides or manages not only its direct dependencies but also all indirect (transitive) dependencies required through them.
-
B.
hasDependency
Indicates that one entity relies on or requires another entity in order to function, exist, or be fulfilled.
-
C.
hasDependentSupport
Indicates that one entity provides financial or material support for another entity who is recognized as a dependent.
-
D.
supportsFeature
chosen
Indicates that one entity provides, enables, or is compatible with a particular feature or capability of another.
-
E.
supportsImplementationOf
Indicates that one entity provides the necessary resources, framework, or assistance for another entity to be carried out, realized, or put into practice.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca82de7b8c81908d8106f8a53cff9b |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:04 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cb787414508190a08cf47d1545ce50 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 7:32 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cb36b437e881909958591357e83b9d |
completed | March 31, 2026, 2:51 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:48 p.m.