Triple
T8235
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Brooklyn Bridge |
E163
|
entity |
| Predicate | openedIn |
P617
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 1883 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 1883 | Statement: [Brooklyn Bridge, openedIn, 1883]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: openedIn Context triple: [Brooklyn Bridge, openedIn, 1883]
-
A.
opened
Indicates that one entity caused another entity (such as an object, container, or passage) to change from a closed or inaccessible state to an open or accessible state.
-
B.
presentedBy
Indicates that something (such as an event, performance, or work) is formally organized, hosted, or introduced by a particular person or entity.
-
C.
introduced
Indicates that one entity caused another entity to become known, presented, or brought into use for the first time to a person, group, or context.
-
D.
orderInOffice
Indicates that one entity holds a specific sequential position or rank within a defined term or period of holding an office or official role.
-
E.
submittedTo
Indicates that one entity has formally sent or presented something (such as a document, request, or work) to another entity for consideration, review, or processing.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a23bb612708190b09f25385e4b63d1 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 12:49 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a2407916ac8190b76d2e6690efaef3 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:10 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a23fe3a87881909ab95bb3a0b474ec |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:07 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a240782e108190b6b60c26b84ae179 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:10 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 12:54 a.m.