Triple

T8224267
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject BMT lines E192138 entity
Predicate includesFormerService P3388 FINISHED
Object BMT 1 (Brighton Local) historical designation LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: BMT 1 (Brighton Local) historical designation | Statement: [BMT lines, includesFormerService, BMT 1 (Brighton Local) historical designation]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: includesFormerService
Context triple: [BMT lines, includesFormerService, BMT 1 (Brighton Local) historical designation]
  • A. hasFormerService chosen
    Indicates that an entity previously provided a service to another entity but no longer does so.
  • B. militaryUnitTypeServed
    Indicates that an entity served in, or was a member of, a specific type of military unit.
  • C. servedInRole
    Indicates that one entity performed duties or held a position within a specified role or office in relation to another entity.
  • D. militaryBranchEligibility
    Indicates that an entity meets the required conditions to serve in a specified branch of the military.
  • E. alsoServeIn
    Indicates that an entity serves in an additional role, position, or capacity alongside its primary one.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca82c9a8ac81908b011c38698456e4 completed March 30, 2026, 2:03 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cb77cc351481908d7dcd6d3d15d59f completed March 31, 2026, 7:29 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cb36af41e081909dee92b9bc4947f1 completed March 31, 2026, 2:51 a.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:45 p.m.