Triple
T8175446
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Security Center |
E190927
|
entity |
| Predicate | monitorsSetting |
P752
|
FINISHED |
| Object | firewall status |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: firewall status | Statement: [Security Center, monitorsSetting, firewall status]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: monitorsSetting Context triple: [Security Center, monitorsSetting, firewall status]
-
A.
monitors
chosen
Indicates that one entity observes, tracks, or checks the state, behavior, or performance of another entity over time.
-
B.
typicalMonitor
Indicates that one entity commonly or characteristically monitors, observes, or oversees another entity in a usual or expected manner.
-
C.
displayConfiguration
Indicates a relationship where one entity defines or presents the arrangement, layout, or settings used to visually display another entity.
-
D.
monitoringOutput
Indicates that one entity observes, records, or tracks the performance, behavior, or results produced by another entity or process.
-
E.
monitoringBody
Indicates that one entity is responsible for overseeing, supervising, or tracking the activities, performance, or compliance of another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca82c1c0a08190bf8692b4d91a03ca |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:03 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cb4ab8295081909a450fcaa34f6ec6 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 4:16 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cb36a7952481908f34e3e82f375a84 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 2:51 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:40 p.m.