Triple
T817118
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Amazon Redshift |
E17671
|
entity |
| Predicate | supportsIntegrationType |
P8841
|
FINISHED |
| Object | ETL tools |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: ETL tools | Statement: [Amazon Redshift, supportsIntegrationType, ETL tools]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supportsIntegrationType Context triple: [Amazon Redshift, supportsIntegrationType, ETL tools]
-
A.
supportsProjectType
Indicates that one entity is capable of handling, accommodating, or being compatible with a specified type of project.
-
B.
typeOfIntegration
chosen
Indicates the specific kind or category of integration that exists or is applied between systems, components, or processes.
-
C.
isSupportedBy
Indicates that an entity is upheld, sustained, or enabled by another entity, which provides necessary assistance, resources, or justification.
-
D.
supportsMissionType
Indicates that one entity is capable of handling, enabling, or being compatible with a specified type of mission.
-
E.
supportsInventoryType
Indicates that one entity is capable of handling, managing, or being compatible with a specified type of inventory.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a4937bcaac8190a322524ac6f45a5a |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:28 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4ab621d2c819083f10bff4f66c482 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 9:10 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4aa756920819080ae82948974c876 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 9:07 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:38 p.m.