Triple

T815759
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Julia E17648 entity
Predicate hasStandardImplementation P19955 FINISHED
Object reference implementation in Julia language itself LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: reference implementation in Julia language itself | Statement: [Julia, hasStandardImplementation, reference implementation in Julia language itself]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasStandardImplementation
Context triple: [Julia, hasStandardImplementation, reference implementation in Julia language itself]
  • A. hasStandardVersion
    Indicates that one entity serves as the official or canonical version of another entity.
  • B. hasStandardType
    Indicates that something conforms to or is categorized under a defined standard classification or type.
  • C. hasSoftwareStandard
    Indicates that an entity conforms to, implements, or is governed by a specified software-related standard.
  • D. canBeImplementedWith
    Indicates that one entity is capable of being realized, executed, or fulfilled through the use or application of another entity.
  • E. usesStandard
    Indicates that one entity adopts, follows, or operates according to a specified standard defined by another entity or reference.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a4937bcaac8190a322524ac6f45a5a completed March 1, 2026, 7:28 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4ab5157b08190b6c8f2fd455f261e completed March 1, 2026, 9:10 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a4aa756920819080ae82948974c876 completed March 1, 2026, 9:07 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a4ab4781c88190ae36906251347cdc completed March 1, 2026, 9:10 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:38 p.m.