Triple

T8157172
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject John Osborne E190478 entity
Predicate wrote P2831 FINISHED
Object Inadmissible Evidence E717116 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Inadmissible Evidence | Statement: [John Osborne, wrote, Inadmissible Evidence]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Inadmissible Evidence
Context triple: [John Osborne, wrote, Inadmissible Evidence]
  • A. Inadmissible Evidence chosen
    Inadmissible Evidence is a 1964 stage play by British dramatist John Osborne that portrays the emotional and moral disintegration of a middle-aged London lawyer.
  • B. Evidence
    Evidence is an American hip-hop producer and rapper best known as a member of the group Dilated Peoples and for his solo work in underground rap.
  • C. Evidence
    "Evidence" is a science fiction short story by Isaac Asimov that explores themes of identity and humanity through the suspicion that a prominent politician may secretly be a robot.
  • D. Rule 403
    Rule 403 is a key evidentiary rule in U.S. law that allows courts to exclude relevant evidence if its probative value is substantially outweighed by risks such as unfair prejudice, confusion, or waste of time.
  • E. Federal Rule of Evidence 1003
    Federal Rule of Evidence 1003 is a U.S. evidentiary rule that permits the use of duplicates in place of original writings, recordings, or photographs unless a genuine question is raised about the original’s authenticity or it would be unfair to admit the duplicate.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca82bfeb6481909d07b91b5cf69f59 completed March 30, 2026, 2:03 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cb44da14a481909f8d3277762b0e75 completed March 31, 2026, 3:51 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69cced43a5448190b2600cbdbabf9d31 completed April 1, 2026, 10:02 a.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:37 p.m.